Showing posts with label Financial Impact of Autism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Financial Impact of Autism. Show all posts

Brother Can You Spare...$2 Million! Autism Care Costs Roughly $2 Million for a Lifetime

Autism Care Costs Roughly $2 Million For a Lifetime

Autism
Autism (Photo : hepingting/ Flickr)

Caring for someone with autism is no simple task. Oftentimes parents or relatives need to re-evaluate and opt for home-based employment to provide focused attention on the child as well as pay for additional expenses related to specialized instruction and the like. 
For most parents and caregivers, support is readily given but in totality, how much does it cost financially to support and care for someone with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)? 
According to a recent study by Autism Speaks, published in JAMA Pediatrics, in the United States, families can expect to shell out about $1.4 to $2.4 million lifetime support and expenses for a person diagnosed with autism or an equivalent of 0.92 million to 1.5 million pounds in the United Kingdom.
The study describes ASD as "a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by impaired social ability, especially communication, and repetitive patterns of behavior, interests or activities. The disorders can be associated with significant functional impairment and result in high financial costs for families." 
The experts recognize that there is very little information on the economic effects of families and societies when it comes to dealing with ASD, hence a literature review examining the costs and economic impact in terms of autism lifetime support is in order.
According to the researchers, "[The] study presents the most comprehensive estimates to date of the financial costs of ASDs in the United States and the United Kingdom. [The] costs are much higher than previously suggested. ..."
They continued, "There is also an urgent need for a better understanding of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions and support arrangements that address the needs and respond to the preferences of individuals with ASDs and their families. Because the economic effects of ASDs in individuals with or without intellectual disability are considerable throughout life, so too should the search for more efficient and equitable use of resources span all age groups."

The research is an important analysis of the reach of ASD diagnosis. It is not limited to medical or service, it also has effects on the immediate circle of the patient including their social and financial way of life, especially in cases where there is a limited ability to be productive in adulthood. 
The research team, led by Ariane V.S. Buescher, M.Sc. of the London School of Economics and Political Science, believe that an increase in the understanding of the totality of ASD is important. That autism is expensive is something that is commonly known but this data puts an estimated numerical value on that expense. 
"Improving our understanding of how life unfolds will require a serious commitment to longitudinal, population-based data collection. For nearly seven decades, evidence from the Framingham Heart Study and other longitudinal studies has laid the foundation for our contemporary understanding of the epidemiology and treatment of cardiovascular disease. We need a Framingham Study for autism spectrum disorders, especially to track risks and outcomes into middle and later adulthood," concluded the researchers.

How Much Does it Cost to Raise an Autistic Child?



These facts do tell a story, but not the entire story of what it cost a family to raise a child with autism. It's missing the financial impact on families which can be measured in loss of income when parents cannot simultaneously hold down a full time job and care for their child.  

From my perspective it also raises the question "How will school districts manage this growing expense, year after year as more students with autism hit school age?  I don't believe our school district has the answers yet, and what I see causes me great concern.  In this article Michael Rosanoff  asks "Whether school districts have the resources to handle the needs of all students with autism, and whether individual children are being well served?".  

I know my response...would love to hear yours :) 

If you're so inclined post your comments about how things look to you; is your school delivering? 

Is your insurance coverage working?  


____________________________


By Amy Norton, 
Health Day News  http://consumer.healthday.com/cognitive-health-information-26/autism-news-51/autism-care-averages-17-000-per-year-study-finds-684667.html

School systems bear the brunt, not parents, researchers find.
The cost of services for children with autism averages more than $17,000 per child each year -- with school systems footing much of the bill, a new U.S. study estimates.

Researchers found that compared to kids without autism, those with the disorder had higher costs for
doctor visits and prescriptions -- an extra $3,000 a year, on average.

The biggest expenses for parents with autistic children are outside of the medical realm. But the biggest expenses were outside the medical realm. "Non-health care" services averaged $14,000 per child, and special education at school accounted for more than 60 percent of those costs.


Past studies into the costs of autism have mainly focused on health care, said Tara Lavelle, a researcher at RAND Corp. in Arlington, Va., who led the new study published online Feb. 10 and in
the March print issue of Pediatrics. These findings, she said, give a more comprehensive view. Her team estimates that services for children with autism cost the United States $11.5 billion in 2011 alone.

"The societal cost is enormous," said Michael Rosanoff, associate director of public health research and scientific review for Autism Speaks, a New York City-based advocacy group. And the dollar estimates from this study cover only children with autism -- not adults, noted Rosanoff, who was not involved in the research. He said the findings do give a clearer idea of the costs to school systems, in particular. Now more work is needed to "dig deeper" into the issue, Rosanoff said. Some big questions, he noted, are whether school districts have the resources to handle the needs of all students with autism, and whether individual children are being well served.

In the United States, about one in every 88 children has an autism spectrum disorder, according to 
the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The developmental disorders vary widely in severity.  Some kids have "classic" autism, speaking very little, and showing repetitive, unusual behaviors like hand flapping; they may also be intellectually impaired. Other kids have average or
above-average intelligence, but have difficulty with social interaction.

For the new study, Lavelle's team pulled data from two national surveys. They found information on 246 families with children affected by autism spectrum disorders, ranging from mild to severe, and close to 19,000 families with unaffected children.

In one survey, parents were asked about non-medical services for their kids -- from special education at school, to autism therapy sessions, to help with child care. Those costs turned out to be much
bigger than medical care, with special ed being the single largest expense -- at $8,600 per year, on average.
There was one surprise in the findings, according to Lavelle: Parents of kids with autism spectrum disorders reported no greater out-of-pocket expenses than other parents, on average.


"That's inconsistent with previous research, which has found higher out-of-pocket costs," Lavelle said. She noted that this study had a fairly small sample of families affected by autism, and that might have prevented the researchers from finding substantial differences in parents' expenses. Rosanoff agreed that the finding is surprising. But he said it's possible that this latest study reflects progress in getting insurers to pay for autism therapies.

As it stands, 34 U.S. states have now passed "autism insurance reform laws," according to Autism Speaks. Several others are considering such legislation.

"This study could suggest that autism insurance reform is working," Rosanoff said. Lavelle said more studies are needed to see how families are coping financially. As for schools, she
said very little is known about whether districts have the resources they need to serve all their students with autism.

Rosanoff said one potential way to lessen the burden on schools would be to improve early diagnosis
and treatment of autism.

Diagnosing an autism spectrum disorder can be difficult, since there's no simple test for it. According to the CDC, autism can sometimes be diagnosed by the age of 18 months, but many children do not receive a final diagnosis until they are much older. The agency says that all chidren should be screened for developmental delays during routine checkups, starting at the age of 9 months. Such screening could help in detecting an autism spectrum disorder sooner. If children can be diagnosed early, Rosanoff said, they can begin therapy well ahead of school age. That might ease their reliance on special education once they do enter school, he said.

Parents of autistic children fight for treatment in an unforgiving market

Parents of autistic children fight for treatment in an unforgiving market
Therapy costing up to $40,000 a year aggravates insurance providers, whose refusal to cover it can leave parents struggling

ABA and OT Therapy were the only solutions to the pain
Nick experienced when he hear loud noises. 
Rob Gorski is a blogger and the father of three boys – Gavin, 14, Elliott, 8, and Emmett, 5 – all of whom are autistic. Gorksi remembered the multiple letters to his home in Canton, Ohio that told him that one of his sons could not renew his health insurance for a popular autism therapy because the insurance officials decided treatment was no longer necessary.
“One time, we got a letter for Emmett that said he was never going to learn,” said Gorksi. “Who are you to tell me that my son isn’t going to amount to something?”
So he turned to his blog, Lost and Tired, a frank and vivid chronicle of caring for three autistic boys. “I raised all kinds of hell,” he said. “I started using my blog to fight. Sometimes it took weeks and months to get the approvals.” Things have changed since then, he added. “Now, it’s automatically renewed.”
It shouldn't be such a struggle, he thinks. Gorski’s children are on Medicaid and, as a result, should be insured for therapy. “People think, 'You’re on Medicaid, you’re okay' – but you’re not,” said Gorski.
Gorski's struggle is a common one for parents of children with autism, a growing cohort in the United States. The number of children with autism has been rising; the latest numbers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that 1 in 68 American children have autism. 
A 2006 report by the Harvard School of Public Health said it cost the US $35bn to care for people with autism through their lifetime. In 2012, the cost leaped to $126bn, according to Autism Speaks, an advocacy organization. 

Insurance coverage isn't keeping up with the demand, and parents of children with autism often find themselves mired in administrative paperwork and vast yearly expenses. Although the Affordable Care Act requires insurance companies to cover behavioral health, it allows the states to decide the details, including the extent of coverage and hours of therapy. As a result, coverage for autism varies from state to state, and even plan to plan.
Parents and advocacy groups argue that children with autism deserve full coverage, just as those with any other medical condition. But a common autism therapy –applied behavior analysis, or ABA – is a sticking point. While applied behavior analysis is widely accepted as one of the most effective treatments for autism, it is also one of the most difficult to get insured. 

ABA is based on the science of behavior and uses one-on-one interaction to teach, communicate and effect changes in the behavior of autistic children. That takes time, from 25 to 40 hours a week of one-on-one therapy depending on the severity of autism. It also usually lasts for years, often starting when the child is as young as two. It can also become vastly expensive, often into five figures a year, which creates a struggle for middle-class families. 

“Much of the expense can be directly related to the intensity of the treatment,” said Matt McAlear, an ABA therapist in San Francisco, adding, “while there is not much we agree on in the autism community, we do agree that autism is a life long disability and that the earlier we can start intervention, the better the long-term outcomes." Autism itself is a spectrum of disabilities –it varies from people with mild social and communication difficulties to those who don’t speak at all. Insurance companies say that since autism includes a variety of conditions, applied behavior analysis, too encompasses an array of treatments. And this, they claim, makes it difficult to promise full coverage. The insurance companies don’t dispute that ABA helps, but they say research hasn't proven ABA’s efficacy.

“Insurance coverage is focused on those treatments that are medically necessary,” said Rhonda Robinson, a health consultant and the chief medical officer at UnitedHealth Group. Medical necessity, by definition, refers to any health service that is “appropriate” for evaluating and treating a given condition.
Insurance companies, Robinson explained, determine medical necessity through research that clearly defines the population and documents the treatment’s efficiency and durability. Is it helping? How long will it’s effects last? ABA research, she said, doesn’t meet many of these criteria yet. “It’s not quite there but it’s getting there,” she added.
The problem has already drawn opponents – and lawsuits – against the insurers. “There has been enormous, long-standing discrimination against people with developmental disabilities by insurance companies,” says Eleanor Hamburger, a Seattle-based attorney who has brought class action suits demanding autism coverage.
It also creates a growing class of frustrated parents. Jennifer Sheridan, the mother of a nine-year-old autistic son, Charlie, is one of them.
“If the data shows that your child is not progressing, they’ll cut you off, and if your child does better than expected, they’ll cut you off then too,” says Sheridan. “So you must sit right on average.”
“Some people are good responders, some are not,” said Hamburger. How long the treatment takes shouldn’t matter either, she argued, because, “If insurers don’t cap services based on age, why should they cap mental health services?”
$85 an hour for 30 hours a week, every week of the year
Sheridan remembers the day she realized she could no longer afford therapy for Charlie. It was Christmas.
“Frankly, we couldn’t keep up any longer,” she says. Charlie, a lanky kid with curly brown hair, was diagnosed when he was two-years-old. Since then, Sheridan and her husband, David, have spent $15,000 a year on average for applied behavior analysis. 
Families such as the Sheridans, who don’t qualify for Medicaid and cannot find insurance plans that cover ABA, are struggling to pay out of pocket. Charlie’s ABA therapy approximately cost $85 an hour. He was prescribed 30 hours of therapy every week. But his parents couldn’t afford to pay for more than eight to 10 hours.
“We never had that kind of money,” says Sheridan. “We had to slowly taper off as the years went by. It just got less and less because we couldn’t afford it anymore.” Last year, they tried giving him the least amount of therapy and it cost them $6,000.
“And that’s low,” says Sheridan. “One year, we spent $18,000. Many families spend $20k, $30k, $40k and up. It depends on how much credit you can get.”
Charlie stopped therapy in January. He hasn’t been to a session since.
“It breaks my heart that I can’t get him any more therapy this year,” says Sheridan. “But we have got mortgage payments. We have got car payments. The amount of debt we have incurred to pay for therapy almost matches our mortgage payment.”
The Sheridans live in Nashville, and Tennessee is one of the 14 states that are yet to pass legislation mandating state insurance plans to cover autism therapy.
The Sheridans are on a self-insured plan paid for by David’s employer, T-Mobile, which puts them in an unusual position because self-insured plans are federally regulated and not governed by state-level mandates. While many companies, including T-Mobile, pay for autism-related therapies such as those for speech, not all of them pay for ABA. They aren’t required to do so by federal law either. Even if Tennessee were to pass a law mandating coverage for autism, that wouldn’t apply to the Sheridans unless the federal government passed a similar law.
'Nothing you say will matter. I have no way to help him'
But that doesn’t deter Sheridan, who is a strong local advocate for Autism Speaks. “What we are hoping is that we’ll get this passed across the country,” she said. Even if the state laws don’t help her, she added, they would help families like hers. And eventually, she believes, the federal government will do the same.
Sheridan, meanwhile, is struggling to help Charlie without his therapy. For the most part, she said, he is doing okay. Her “little blur”, as she likes to call him, is still active. He still loves watching YouTube videos of either elevators or tours of people’s homes.
Charlie was home-schooled for years, Sheridan says, because he couldn’t tolerate the noise or the number of people in a classroom. Now he goes to public school. “He participates in Chinese class, in gym class and math is his strength,” says Sheridan. “ABA did that for us.”
He is popular at school where, Sheridan says, the girls fight over who gets to be his “helper”. He has friends who invite him to birthday parties. Charlie goes but his father always goes with him.
But he still doesn’t know how to cross the street. “He can’t go on the sidewalk by himself,” Sheridan says. “I need someone who can understand his reactions to a street corner. I can’t look that up [online].”
She’s also unsure of what upsets him. When they are driving and she is forced to take a detour, she said, Charlie starts screaming. “I don’t know what’s setting him off,” she said. “Nothing you say will matter. I have no way to help him. He’s verbal but he’s not conversational.”
She worries that things will get worse as he gets older – and stronger. His head already reaches up to her nose. “He’s taken a swat at me but because of [applied behavior analysis] we figured out how to redirect it,” Sheridan says. “But he’s getting bigger, too big for me to handle him. When the hormones set in … that’s what I am worried about.”



California & Self Determination a Community Divided


Self Determination is moving forward and people are divided. Last year we posted - News Alert: California & Self Determination...Who Should Choose? RC's or You?    http://autism2daily.blogspot.com/2013/05/news-alert-california-self.html



This week a passionate, unidentified reader posted this response. 

Oh my gash. DO NOT be tricked by this scam! California Regional Centers are going upside down because of their own inside corruption, so the state's answer to this is to shift the burden of finding supports and services onto already burned out and stressed out parents of disabled people. Do not be tricked into a self determination nightmare. Make these regional centers do their dang job. It is their duty to secure services for families of developmentally disabled children. It should not be the parent's burden, unless the parents have a very high functioning developmentally disabled child. Parents of children who are severely disabled and need a daily, intensive support system will not benefit from self determination because it's Regional Center's trick to shift all the responsibility to provide all these complex supports onto the family, so they don't have to. Parents BEWARE...The Lanterman Act. Disability Rights. Protection and Advocacy should know better. They should know by now how these Regional Centers aren't doing their jobs with the most severely disabled who need the most complex services. These Regional Centers are only set up to serve the easiest cases. They have few people working in these regional centers who have any real experience in the more complex needs of the severely disabled regional center clients. If your child has a mild disorder or needs a few respite hours, great, go for it, but if your child is very severe and requires intensive services, BEWARE, don't get sucked into this scam, so that your family is saddled with the responsibility to find supports and services that all these Regional Centers are paying their employees to do. Why even have 21 Regional Centers if they are slowly passing the job duties onto the families??????


What do you think? Are you ready for SD? Is it the best solution for your family? Should Regional Centers shift their role?

Autism costs Americans an estimated $126 billion annually, a number that has more than tripled since 2006



Autism costs Americans an estimated $126 billion annually, a number that has more than tripled since 2006. For me, this begs the question, what's going to happen to the cost of care as more and more young adults age out of the system, and we want comprehensive programs, where their education continues beyond how to stuff & lick envelopes? What's that going to cost and who will help us then? 

The costs of providing care for each person with autism affected by intellectual disability through his or her lifespan are $2.3 million in the U.S. and £1.5 million ($2.4 million) in the U.K. The lifetime costs of caring for individuals who are not impacted by intellectual disability are $1.4 million in the U.S. and £917,000 in the U.K. (equivalent to $1.46 million) and from where I sit it will only grow as the ASD population increases and more families gain access to critical ABA services and the burden on families has been outrageous. On that note, my thanks goes out to everyone in our federal, state and local government and local advocates who have pushed so long and hard for insurance to cover ABA, and thanks to the affordable care act for eliminating the pre-existing condition barrier to insurance.  

Nick and I began his autism journey with no options except to pay out of pocket or forgo critical services. I am grateful for the progress and shared responsibility between families, private insurance and state and federally funded programs.  Until Obama care, I was unable to change or shop for new insurance because I could not risk being denied. I remember before Nick was diagnosed - he had stopped talking and was suddenly withdrawn - I called my insurance and said "I need my child to see a speech pathologist". The representative on the phone asked me why, and I said "He suddenly stopped talking and I've been told he needs to be evaluated right away".  She said "I can't refer you without a diagnosis" and we went back and forth, I had no diagnosis that was why he needed to be seen, and she held firm that without a diagnosis he could not be seen! I told her that the professional I had spoken to said he should be evaluated for autism. Her reply "I'm sorry but we don't cover autism. I can't help you, and she hung up".  I was blown away. That was cruel, and at the time I remember thinking this is crazy!!!  That was one of the many moments that turned me from a mom into an pissed off advocate determined to get help for families. Here in California thousands of families, state agencies and non profits have worked hard for years and now our families have coverage for speech, OT and ABA (although not always without a fight).  At the same time, we can stop take a breath and be thankful for the places where we have made progress. 

But we're not out of the woods yet, we will need to stay diligent as many states are still fighting for insurance reform as it relates to autism and we've yet to uncover the challenges when it come to our kids who are aging out.  What's going to happen to the cost of care when there's no school everyday and we want more for our children than day programs that find them just sitting around being taught to lick envelopes? What's that going to cost and who will help us then? Sigh, the journey continues. 


Here are links to where I got my statistics and different perspectives on how Obama Care impacts autism care.





How the ACA Will Affect People with Autism - One Journalists Perspective


I just found this article today about Autism and the Affordable Care act, it's a perspective worth sharing.

Q&A: How ACA Will Affect People With Autism 


Braylon Smith, of Carl Junction, Mo., undergoes Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) treatment for autism in his home. The Affordable Care Act largely leaves decisions on autism coverage to states. (AP)
Autism advocates celebrated what they thought was a major victory when President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act in 2010:  They expected the law to require all insurance companies to cover pricey, potentially lifelong treatments for those with the incurable condition.
But instead of creating a national standard for autism coverage, the administration bowed to political pressure from states and insurers and left it to states to define, within certain parameters, the “essential benefits” that insurance companies must provide.
Coverage requirements for autism treatments, such as behavioral counseling and speech and occupational therapy, already vary from state to state.  Far from smoothing out those differences, critics say the ACA will add a new layer of complexity.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) says it will consider setting a national standard in 2016. Until then, states will decide what autism treatments insurance companies must cover.

What is autism, how is it treated and at what cost?

Autism is a mental disorder affecting more than 2 million Americans and tens of millions of people worldwide. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, one in every 88 children in the U.S has the condition, and the number is rising. Paying for treatment can be financially catastrophic to families.
Symptoms of autism first appear from birth to early childhood, and include mild to severe social, communication and behavioral challenges as well as repetitive behaviors. Treatments include counseling, speech and physical therapy and medications.
Advocates say applied behavior analysis (ABA), in which a therapist reinforces positive behaviors in the patient, is essential to helping children with autism reach their full potential. ABA, developed in the 1960s, has become the most widely used autism treatment. But it requires hours of intensive, one-on-one therapy, and costs as much as $60,000 a year.
Depending on the severity of symptoms, a trained therapist using ABA may spend as many as 40 hours a week with a child. A new study by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and the London School of Economics estimates the cost of treating a person with autism during his or her lifetime is $2.3 million. Autism costs Americans an estimated $126 billion annually, a number that has more than tripled since 2006.

Who opposes broad coverage of autism treatments?

ABA is endorsed by the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the U.S. Surgeon General. But insurance companies often object to paying for it because they say it is unproven and is largely educational, not medical. The Council for Affordable Health Insurance, an organization of insurance professionals, small businesses and health care providers, also argues that covering ABA is so costly it causes insurance premiums to rise, making basic health coverage unaffordable for millions of Americans.

What have states done to help ensure coverage of autism therapies?

Starting with Indiana in 2001, a total of 34 states and the District of Columbia have enacted autism insurance mandates, requiring carriers within their borders to provide coverage of ABA and other autism treatments in some or all of their policies.
States require insurers to cover nearly 2,300 categories of illness, treatments, and screenings.  Every state with an autism mandate requires insurers to cover ABA for state employees. Beyond that, state laws vary widely. Some apply only to individual health policies, while others include small group and large corporate policies. (No state mandates apply to the self-funded policies large employers typically offer, which is the type of coverage one-quarter of insured Americans have.)
Last year, the federal government began requiring coverage of ABA for the nation’s 8 million federal employees, retirees and their dependents.  Insurance coverage for members of the military also includes ABA treatments, with some restrictions.

Will existing state insurance mandates apply to policies sold on the state insurance exchanges?

Maybe.
The ACA says state insurance mandates in place before Dec. 31, 2011 may apply to policies offered on the exchanges.  If a state requires commercial carriers to cover ABA, that same requirement may be applied to policies sold on its exchange.
However, when the administration directed states to define “essential benefits,” every state either chose a “benchmark plan” (defined as the small business plan in the state with the most beneficiaries) or let the federal government choose a similar plan for them. If a state’s benchmark plan includes a requirement to cover ABA and other autism treatments, then all the plans on its exchange must do the same.
But in 11 of the 34 states with autism mandates, the benchmark plan does not include autism coverage, according to an analysis by advocates Autism Speaks. In those states, as well as the 16 states without autism mandates, state officials have the option of adding autism coverage as a required “supplemental” plan.
In Ohio, where the legislature is currently considering an autism bill, Gov. John Kasich, a Republican, mandated autism coverage by executive order in December 2012.  Alaska’s insurance chief, Bret Kolb, wrote to state lawmakers last month confirming that Alaska’s newly-minted autism mandate would apply to policies sold on the federally-run exchange.

How do state mental health parity laws affect autism patients?

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, every state but Wyoming now has a mental health parity law on the books, requiring that when insurers cover mental illness and/or substance abuse they do so on an equal financial basis with physical illnesses.  A federal law – the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Act of 2008 – also requires equal treatment, but the Obama administration has yet tocomplete the federal rules that would enable states to enforce it.
Parity laws only require carriers to pay as much for mental health treatments as they pay for medical treatments, with the same co-pays, deductibles and coverage limitations. The laws do not require carriers to cover specific treatments, such as ABA treatments. Still, state parity laws, combined with mandates, will maximize coverage for any given child.

What is “habilitation” and how does it affect autism coverage?

The federal government lists 10 categories of health care services states must include in their essential benefits. Two relate to autism: mental health services and habilitation, which is defined as therapies for children with developmental disabilities. In accepting state benchmark plans last year, HHS told states they must spell out what services are covered under habilitation. The way states define habilitation and how that plays out after 2014, when insurance companies begin processing claims, remains to be seen.

Insurance Coverage for Autism Extended in CA

This just in from Dr. Vismara. Great to see everyone's efforts paying off in California!  Best, Donna

steinberg-lh-masthead




                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Dear Colleagues.. please see the following press release..Although there is still important work ahead,  this is an important step in the right direction. Many thanks to all who contributed to this crucial effort.  Cheers. Lou


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 9, 2013
Contact: Mark Hedlund, (916) 651-4006

Insurance Coverage for Autism Extended
                                                                                             
(Sacramento) – A program that has already helped more than 12,500 Californians receive insurance coverage for early autism treatment has now been extended an additional two-and-a-half years. Senate Bill 126, authored by Senate President pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) and passed unanimously by both the Assembly and the Senate, was signed into law today by Governor Jerry Brown.

SB 126 extends provisions of the California Autism Insurance Mandate requiring private health care insurance plans to provide coverage for “behavioral health treatment” of children with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. The program was originally established in 2011 under SB 946 (Steinberg), but the mandate was set to expire in July of next year. This law now extends the provisions until January 1, 2017.

“Earlier this year, I stood on the Capitol steps and called for an extension to help tens of thousands more receive autism behavioral health treatments. Today, that hope for more effective therapy is a reality for those who desperately need it,” said Steinberg. “I’m proud that California is leading the nation on ensuring treatments for those with autism.”

The bill also allows for the evaluation of recommendations by the Department of Managed Health Care Autism Taskforce, a process for licensure for providers and paraprofessionals of behavioral health treatments, coordination with the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), and assessment of future ACA guidelines.

Autism is the nation’s most rapidly growing serious developmental disability, as the number of those living with autism in the United States is 300 percent higher than it was in 2005. Nearly one in every 50 children in U.S. children exhibits signs of autism spectrum disorders. Research shows that early behavioral intervention therapies improve brain functions, promote higher cognitive functions and reduce self-injurious behaviors for a significant number of individuals with ASD.

Since the autism insurance mandate initially went into effect on July 1, 2012, the California Department of Insurance estimates annual taxpayer savings of up to $200 million in intervention costs from regional centers and special education programs.

Economic Benefits to Early Intervention...Pay Now Pay Later!


Autism: Early intervention found cost effective through school years

Posted By News On May 1, 2013 - 2:30pm

Nick with his BII in pre-school. Worth every dollar! 
(NEW YORK, N.Y.) May 1, 2013 – The Early Start Denver Model (ESDM), a comprehensive behavioral early intervention program that is appropriate for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as young as 12 months, has been found to reduce the need for ASD therapies and special education services through the school years following their early intervention. These findings were presented by David S. Mandell, Sc.D., Associate Professor, Director, Center for Mental Health Policy & Services Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, today at the Autism Speaks Toddler Treatment Network meeting held in San Sebastian, Spain concurrent with the start of the International Meeting for Autism Research.
The investigation evaluated cost of the early intervention, both ESDM and typically available "community" early intervention services, both in combination with traditional autism-specific related services including other forms of ABA, speech therapy, occupational therapy and physical therapy.
After the clinical trial comparing ESDM to community interventions was completed, all children were referred back to the community and parents were free to seek services for their child. During this post-intervention period, children in the ESDM group were found to receive fewer hours of service per month than the children who received early intervention services typically-available in the community (168 vs. 257). This difference is spread across many different services, but is concentrated in the use of special education services and individual therapies, including speech and language therapy, physical therapy and occupational therapy. On the other hand, the ESDM group received many more hours in typical education settings than the group of children who previously received typically available early intervention services.
ESDM is the first early intervention for toddlers with ASD to undergo controlled clinical study of intensive early intervention and has demonstrated both improvement of social skills and brain responses to social stimuli. These optimal outcomes include increased IQ, increased adaptive and social behaviors as well as promoting the normal development of the brain and behavior that optimizes a child's potential to participate meaningfully in the community into their adult years.
"It is very promising to see that children who received two years of ESDM intervention required fewer hours of therapy and special education services through the remainder of their preschool years," said Geraldine Dawson, Ph.D., Autism Speaks chief science officer. "Not only do the young children who receive ESDM benefit in the short term with respect to improved IQ and social skills, and brain functioning, we see that through their remaining preschool years these children require fewer special education supports."
This findings compare 21 children who underwent ESDM to 18 children who received community early intervention during the two years they received these early intervention services and then for four years as they were followed by Principal Investigator Annette Mercer Estes, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor of Speech and Hearing Sciences and Research Affiliate, in the Center on Human Development and Disability at University of Washington. Dr. Estes compiled all of the services the children continued to receive post intervention. Dr. Mandell then converted them to 9 categories of therapy and calculated the cost of each category by multiplying the number of hours of each type of service received by the common cost units based on public reimbursement models in U.S. and U.K.
While ESDM frontloads costs and is more expensive to deliver in those first two years of early intervention, the end of elementary schools by the time children entered high school, ESDM showed a positive return on investment ,by the time children will enter high school" explained Dr. Mandell. "Based on the data we had available, the cost effectiveness of ESDM over a relatively short period of time is clear, even when only examining this narrow group of services. Given what we know about service use as children with autism age, it is quite likely that the long-term cost savings will be even greater," he continued.
During the two years of delivery, ESDM, including all related services, had an average monthly cost of approximately $10,000/child. The average monthly cost of ESDM alone is $5,560/child. Children in the control group, who were receiving standard community-based early intervention, had an average monthly cost of about $5,200/child.
In the four years post early intervention, during which these children were tracked, the ESDM cohort required on average approximately $4,450 in related services – speech therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and ABA. The community intervention children, on average, required approximately $5,550 in related services.
Dr. Mandell believes this is provocative research. "We used a very narrow definition of cost for this study, including only autism-specific services, such as physical, occupational and speech therapies as well as ABA," he explained, "I believe the cost efficiencies would become even more pronounced if there had been an evaluation on health costs and overall family economics such as the ability of both parents to continue to work and earn income while their child received services."
ESDM, which combines applied behavioral analysis (ABA) teaching methods with developmental 'relationship-based' approaches, was previously demonstrated to achieve significant gains in cognitive, language and daily living skills compared to children with ASD who received commonly available community interventions. On average, the preschoolers receiving ESDM for two years improved 17.5 points in IQ compared with 7.0 points in the community intervention comparison group.
"This work creates an important framework, such that validated treatments and interventions should be assessed over the long term," concluded Dr. Mandell. "These metrics, the number of functional services and hours of services of support an individual continues to receive, are important measures to demonstrate efficacy."

Financial Support Available for CA Parents Raising Children with Autism


Are you, or do you know someone caring for a child with with autism who requires or constant supervision and support? If so, you need to know about IHSS. In Home Supportive Services is a CA service providing funds to hire a caregiver - or pay yourself is  you're the caregiver and it is separate from your regional center services :). 


This wonderful CA program can help parents caring for a child with autism - who needs support and/or constant supervision - at home. I have met so many families where mom or dad have needed to stay home to care for their child, to go to doctors and therapies, to supervise services, which resulted in some degree of financial hardship. How many mom's have had to cut their hours, quit their outside of the home jobs?  Well if you're one of us, you should check out his program. It should not change any of your regional center supports, it's not respite and you have flexibility around how you spend it. Ask your Regional Center caseworker about the program and if he/she can make a referral. 

IHSS is a program in CA. Here's a little more information. Good Luck! And please share this will families, you never know who might be in need. 

IHSS – In Home Support Services


What is IHSS?

The IHSS program is a statewide mandated program administered by each county under the direction of the California Department of Social Services. It provides those with limited income who are disabled, blind or over the age of 65 with in–home care services to help them remain safely in their own homes.

The three different IHSS programs explained…

There are three different IHSS programs: The Medi–Cal Personal Care Services Program (PCSP), The IHSS Independence Plus Waiver Program (IPWP) and The Original or Residual IHSS Program (IHSS–R). The PCSP and IPWP programs are funded with Federal, State and County dollars, while the IHSS–R program is funded with State and County dollars only. Each of these programs provides the same services, but have different eligibility criteria.
  • PCSP – Recipients are eligible because they have qualified for Medi–Cal on basis of age, blindness or disability. Most IHSS recipients are part of the PCSP program.
  • IPWP – Recipients are eligible because they have qualified for Medi–Cal and are also part of one of the following groups: parent provider for a minor child, spouse providers, advance pay cases and meal allowance cases.
  • IHSS–R – Recipients do not meet PCSP or IPWP requirements and usually have Satisfactory Immigration Status, which denies them federal reimbursement.

What services does IHSS provide?

Services include, but are not limited to:
  • Domestic Services: meal preparation, cleaning, laundry and taking out the garbage.
  • Personal Care Services/Non–Medical Care: bathing, feeding and toileting.
  • Transportation and accompaniment to medical appointments.
  • Protective Supervision: safeguard from injury for persons with mental impairments.
  • Paramedical Tasks: assistance with medications, bowel and bladder care or catheter insertion.

Who is eligible for IHSS?

Any California resident is eligible for IHSS if they:
  1. Are SSI/SSP or Medi–Cal eligible.
  2. Are living in their own homes.
  3. Are blind, disabled or 65 years of age or older.
  4. Are unable to live safely at home without care.
  5. Meet certain financial requirements.
Note: Residents of long term facilities may not receive IHSS in the facility, but may apply if they are expected to be discharged so that IHSS is in place when they return to their homes.

What are the resource limits for IHSS?

  • Recipients of SSI/SSP automatically meet financial requirements.
  • Recipients who meet SSI/SSP eligibility criteria except for income are eligible, but might have to pay a share of cost.
  • Applicants who have more than $2,000 in nonexempt assets ($3,000 for a couple) are not eligible. Applicants can spend down assets in order to qualify; however, they should be aware of penalties/periods of ineligibility.
Note: Although resource requirements for IHSS Personal Care and Waiver programs are the same as Medi–Cal, many IHSS recipients are also on SSI/SSP. Transfers that are permissible under the Medi–Cal and IHSS programs could impact SSI/SSP eligibility.

Who provides IHSS services?

Each county can choose different modes of services delivery: Contract, County Homemaker,or Independent Provider (IP). However, it is up to the individual to decide what mode of service delivery they wish to receive. In the Contract mode, an outside agency dispatches a caregiver to your home. In the County Homemaker mode, the County trains and employs caregivers. Most IHSS clients use the IP mode of service, where the client hires, fires and supervises workers.
In most counties, Public Authorities have been established to improve IP service delivery. IHSS pays IP’s who are hired and supervised by the recipient or the recipient’s guardian/authorized representative. Many IP’s are relatives of the client. Payments are issued by the State Controller’s Office, directly to the IP. The current IP wage throughout most of California is $8.00 (CA minimum wage). In the Bay Area Counties, Public Authorities have been able to negotiate higher wages and comprehensive health and dental benefits.

How does IHSS calculate how many hours I get?

The State has limited monthly services hours to 195 hours per month for non–severely impaired applicants and 283 hours per month for the severely impaired. The County Social Services Agency is responsible for doing a needs assessment for each client at the time of application and yearly thereafter to determine how many hours an applicant will receive monthly. The process of the needs assessment will be repeated yearly, and the number of hours authorized may change with each evaluation.
The assessment evaluates:
  1. The client’s physical/mental condition, living/social situation and ability to perform various functions of daily life.
  2. The client’s statement of need.
  3. Medical records/physicians’ statement of need.
  4. Other information the case manger may consider necessary and appropriate to assess the need.

How do I apply for IHSS?

Call or visit your local Department of Social Services to complete an IHSS application (see link below). Once IHSS receives your application, a caseworker will be assigned to conduct a needs assessment. During the needs assessment, the caseworker will come into your home and ask you questions about your physical and mental capacity in order to determine what you can and cannot do. As part of the application process, you will need to have your health care provider fill out a medical certification form (SOC 873) stating that you are not able to do some activities of daily living (ADLs) on your own and without IHSS you would be at risk for out of home placement. Your living situation will also be evaluated. After the needs assessment, the IHSS caseworker will contact you and let you know if you have been approved or denied the service. If approved, the caseworker will tell you how many hours were authorized.

Appeals

If you are denied Medi-Cal or IHSS or if you do not agree with the number of hours authorized, you may appeal the decision by filing for a fair hearing. You should contact your local legal services office to assist you in the appeal.
Older Post ►
 

Copyright 2011 Autism 2 Daily is proudly powered by blogger.com